Collins French Dictionary 柯林斯法语字典 电子书 mobi pdf txt word 2024 下载

Have confidence find all the words and phrases you need.

Get it right up-to-date coverage of French and English.

Get There fast clear user friendly layout.

Go further extra help with key vocabulary.

puppy

baby

tent

daddy

cork kiss chord

gag guess

so rice kiss

cousin buzz

sheep sugar

pleasure beige

church

judge general

farm raffle

very revel

thin maths

that other

little ball

rat rare

mummy comb

no ran

singing bank

hat rehearse

yet

wall wail

loch

暂无相关内容，正在全力查找中

暂无出版社相关信息，正在全力查找中！

暂无相关书籍摘录，正在全力查找中！

在线阅读地址：Collins French Dictionary 柯林斯法语字典在线阅读

在线听书地址：Collins French Dictionary 柯林斯法语字典在线收听

在线购买地址：Collins French Dictionary 柯林斯法语字典在线购买

暂无原文赏析，正在全力查找中！

书籍介绍

Book Description

This is a new addition to the acclaimed "Collins French Dictionary" range. With its extensive coverage of French language in a compact, affordable format, the "Collins French Dictionary" is an indispensable dictionary for learners of French. Fully up-to-date, with over 35,000 references and 70,000 translations, it includes all the most recent additions to the language. With clear and attractive layout and typography, featuring special entries relating to interesting aspects of French life and culture, notes warning the user of easily confusable words, the "Collins French Dictionary" is compact, reliable and completely up-to-date: the ideal small dictionary for school and general use.

• 作者： 小寒-_,-以人为本 一本万利 发布时间：2010-01-16 09:20:26

  读了三遍 最后的感慨是 终于再也不用读这本书了!!!

• 作者： ロウワー 发布时间：2024-01-26 00:50:34

  哎哟我去作者怎么在豆瓣有种想黑屁又怕被抓的美。

• 作者： 辄馨 发布时间：2012-03-22 09:48:32

  “我们不应该仅仅把工人看作是永恒的失败者，他们的50年历程以无比的坚韧性哺育了自由之树。”——工人运动是对社会变迁的回应，欧文主义在福利国家复活永生

• 作者： aprilg 发布时间：2009-01-18 23:11:15

  very useful!

• 作者： 在路上 发布时间：2020-10-10 18:21:24

  康震个人摘选的历代重要诗词与评点，带有很大主观性，但无可厚非，个人还是很喜欢康震的评点，与传统的摘录完全不同，自成体系，自有评判，不随大流，很好。

• 作者： Figo 发布时间：2021-11-20 21:46:50

  又名《在俄罗斯的一百种被坑和被杀的方法》。赵老师编的这本工具书还是蛮不错，明年带走。

• 《麦肯锡工作法》阅读笔记

  作者：liuyunclouder 发布时间：2015-12-24 15:55:13

  以下根据自己理解整理的内容提纲

  #### 麦式工作法包括哪些内容？

          工作态度

          思考方式

          处理信息技巧

          解决问题技巧

          演示成果技巧

          提升自身能力技巧

  #### 麦式工作态度是怎么样的工作态度？

          客户第一

          ”任何时候”都要积极面对

          追求完美

          不死板，有创新意识

          渴望自立自强，不畏挑战

          注重细节：比如个人外表、图表绘制、邮件标题

          工匠精神：专注于解决问题（准确理解自己被寄予什么样的期望，然后认识到自己的独体优势，并灵活地将其运用到工作中）

          

  #### 麦式思考方式是怎么样的思考方式？

          1.找出主要原因

          2.给出对策

          3.制定具体执行方案

  #### 麦式问题解决技巧是怎么样的技巧？

          原则：抓住真正的问题，保持全局观

          步骤：见“麦肯锡式解决问题的基本步骤”

          

          表层问题：应有状态和现状的不一致

          

  #### 麦式专业作风是什么样的？

          见“麦式工作态度是怎么样的工作态度”

  #### 麦肯锡式解决问题的基本步骤?

          1.区分问题设定与解答区域（找出真正的问题）

          2.整理并将课题结构化（找出与问题相关的主要因素：逻辑树）

          3.收集信息

          4.建立假说

          5.验证假说（找出验证要素：要点树）

          7.考虑解决方案（以现状、意义、对策为基础进行思考：空、雨、伞）

          8.实施解决方案（方案必须明确包含：谁应该如何做什么）

          

          找出问题的本质和原因 + 提出应对已有情况的对策并执行 + 提出预防对策并执行

          2和5需要反复问为什么和还有什么

          

  ##### 麦肯锡式分析框架包括哪些？分别适用于什么场景？

          商业体系：便于把握整体流程（例子：转换职业）

          3C（customer competitor company）：便于了解竞争对手和客户的情况，知己知彼（例子：企业发展）

          7S：评价组织情况，重新审视组织架构

          位置矩阵：选择有多维时（例子：非天然但口感好的饮料）

          逻辑树：寻求解决问题的真正方法时（例子：是否买这辆车）

  #### 麦肯锡式处理信息的技巧?

          获取第一手原始信息

          找准本质和切入点，性感地运用信息（可口可乐和茶归为一类）

          保持开放思维，采用零设想视角

          时刻提醒自己“这一信息，对于达成目标有什么意义”，专注于“希望怎样”，通过联想把信息和目标关联起来

  #### 麦肯锡式提高解决问题能力的思考术?

          

          发掘现状和目标的联系和可能性

          坚持永不放弃

          唤醒五感和专注力（方法：保持充足睡眠、运动或者愉快地玩乐的同时思考问题、冥想）

          使用框架进行思考（逻辑树、3C等）

          超越自己的框架（方法：敢于尝试，有意识地改变自己的行为）

          区分事实和意见（特别是在和他人交流时）

          把意愿转化为简单明了的一句话疑问，从疑问出发（== 问题驱动）

          审视疑问是否是伪命题

          提出高质量问题（见“如何提出高质量问题”）

          保持全局观

          电梯测试（在短时间内清楚地向他人描述你的核心问题）

  ##### 如何提出高质量问题

          提问的基本态度：保持好奇心和空瓶心态

          改变视角（角色转换、时空转换）

          探索原因（哪个环节让你觉得压力大）

          认识对方价值（对你而言，什么东西是无可取代的）

          

  #### 麦肯锡式提高自身能力的方法?

          明确并发挥自己的优势

          审视自己的外表和内在，内在要通过外表展现出来

          保持周围物品和信息的简洁和高质量，营造一个有助于自我提升的环境

          找到榜样，多和榜样交流，利用好富兰克林效应

          不要马上下主观评判，先完成再评价

          每月和前辈吃顿午餐

          

  #### 麦肯锡式创造成果的能力?

          在有限时间内取得成果

          不要因为情绪的问题，导致无法合作，即使不喜欢他，也要能与之产生共鸣，实现共享（方法：清楚对方是什么类型的人，找出对方10个以上的优点和长处）

          在领导询问之前汇报，并根据领导的类型和关注点，采取不一样的汇报方式

          努力体现自己的存在感（方法：领导者、保持自我的同时出色地完成工作）

          领导力要素：如何进行判断的判断力、如何联结相关人员的沟通力、如何付诸实践的执行力

          真诚向他人请教，即使是自己已知的东西，因为也许能获得新的观念和视角

          设计工作，有意识地承担项目管理的角色（方法：利用甘特图把具体何时完成何事清晰表示出来）

          多问“原本希望怎么？”等初心问题，找出真正问题（项目失败时）

          根据会议的内容和目的，设计会议的流程和细节

          说话时尽量用“我们”

          使用分析框架提出高质量的质疑，打开视野

  #### 麦肯锡式演示的技巧?

          演示三要素：收集演示内容、制作演示资料（比如PPT）、实际进行演示

          演示前先把事情的事实、理由及从中推导出的方案等串联为一个链条（空、雨、伞），以一句话概括演示需要回答的核心问题

          利用金字塔结构：事实、理由、方案

          深入思考，提炼抽象获得的信息

          一张图表说明一条信息（单一职责）

          

• Graduate Student Book Report: Sigmund Freud as "mind detective"

  作者：Leogursky 发布时间：2012-10-29 07:31:37

  In my oral report on JREM456 class, I mentioned three major reasons that I recommend Freud’s “Dora: An Analysis of a Case of Hysteria” as a book for science writing class: its resemblance as detective fiction, classic Freudian interpretation of dreams and a great comparison with Jon Franklin’s “Not Quite a Miracle.” In this written book report, I’d like to deep more into its detective fiction style and its comparison with “Not Quite a Miracle.”

  No matter in Conan Doyle’s “Stories of Sherlock Holmes” or Agatha Christie’s “The Murder of Roger Ackroyd,” classic detection novel has its patterns. First, though Sherlock Holmes and Hercule Poirot have different characters and tempers, both of them are involved in mysterious cases with seemingly no clues to follow. However, with the help of their “analyzing skills,” they reconstruct the crime scenes and sequence of the crime events little by little. Interestingly, no matter how crimes change from case to case, Holmes and Poirot’s analysis tools remain the same: marvelous imagination power for perceiving the unthinkable, acute observation for small but decisive evidences and rigorous logic to piece together all clues together and make sense out of them.

  In comparison, Freud uses the same “analysis tools” in his treatment for Dora’s hysteria. His pioneering view that physical illness can be caused by “unfulfilled, repressed will deep down in the unconscious” is beyond the thought of other physicians and shed new light on the treatment of hysteria. During his dream interpretation session for Dora, he watched closely for every word Dora used and every detail in Dora’s dream (“Now, I should like you to pay close attention to the exact word you used. We may have to make use of them.”) Finally, he uses his logic power to put all clues collected from Dora’s dream into a big picture that both in consistency with Dora’s hysteria symptom and in agreement with every principles of his psychoanalysis theory. There is only one difference in this whole analyzing and thinking process: Almost all the clues and evidences are based on the narratives from Dora. On one hand, since the Dora’s mental illness arises from her unconsciousness, there is no “tangible” object to trace. Her narratives are the best and the only clues to make use of. On the other hand, mind is sophisticated. Every word in the narratives needs careful judgment because everyone lies consciously or even unconsciously. Narratives are not as trustworthy as fingerprints or blood stain; they are much more difficult to make use of.

  Nevertheless, other than analyzing tools, Freud’s detective case is different. One example I mentioned during the oral report is that the case is not solved in the end as cases in classic detective novels; Dora broke off the treatment before Freud had been able to reveal all the reasons behind her symptoms and completely cure her. In other word, the “culprit” is still at large. I didn’t mention another interesting difference: There is more than one psychology detective in the case history. Though Freud doesn’t state it explicitly, I have the subtle feeling that Dora, the patient, is the second detective. There is good reason and evidence for this: First, as the victim of hysteria, Dora, in her conscious mind, is eager to find the “culprit” that cause of her illness. Second, in the interpretation of first dream, Freud told the reader that “Dora had already had some training in dream interpretation from having previously analyzed a few minor specimens.” This indicates that Dora is capable of analyzing her mental illness despite that she may not be as experienced as Freud.

  Well, at this point you may argue that having two detectives is not really a surprise. While Watson helps Sherlock Holms, he learns detective skills from Holmes as well. However, this argument is only half-right: In analogy, Dora is indeed a junior detective trained by Freud and also eager to find out the culprit, but she seldom helps Freud in the psychoanalysis. In fact, the whole case history is like the rival between the Freud Dora: While Freud disclosed her repressed love for Herr K. and Frau K., Dora often struggled to use her insights to dispute Freud. She was tortured by hysteria, but she was even more destroyed by her repressed wishes that Freud revealed to her. The treatment is a much more agony. If she has to choose between Freud’s treatment and the torture from hysteria, she would rather choose hysteria.

  In this aspect, Dora is like the patients suffered by both pain physically and loneliness psychologically in Jon Franklin’s “Not Quite a Miracle.” As described in Chapter Ten of this book, “Dr. Long couldn’t cure those patients because they wouldn’t let them. They didn’t dare. They needed the pain. Pain is terrible. Only one thing is worse: loneliness.” Perhaps Freud would be the one that Dr. Long would be so excited to work with to treat those lonely patients? After reading the case history, it occurs to me that when we look at the surgical marvels accomplished by neurosurgeons, it might be a good idea to shift some of our focus to the field of psychology and give some credits to “mind detectives.”